Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 43 Next »

Here are the decisions that a user can take:

  • Validations shift documents from user to user.
  • Rejections take back the documents to the SRM, or the Log/Med Cell for OCB orders at cell level.
  • Amendments of orders can be done only the SRM, and only while orders are in its tasks. Log/Med Cell can amend OCB orders at cell level.
  • Amendment of Standard lists can be done by anyone who has the document in its tasks.
  • Amendment of forecasts can be done only by SRM and Med/Log cell while the documents are in their tasks.

And here are the different workflow set up in the Portal:


Workflow for OCB (MSF in Brussels)

Orders have a four steps validation process, unless some thresholds in the total cost of the order are exceeded, meaning that specific users will be called in the workflow to proceed with additional validation:

Technical orders have the below flow:


Cell orders are those initiated by the cell, for instance in case of emergency, and follow a much shorter validation path:

In case of unknown items, here below is what the cell technical order will look like:

Standard lists and forecasts follow a four steps validation path:



Workflow for the Emergency pools

Orders are validated just once by the Pool, and no threashold is foreseen:

Technical orders are as below:


Standard lists and forecasts (scenarios) are validated as follows:


Workflow for External clients

Orders have this validation flow and no threshold is foreseen:

Technical orders, no threshold either:

For external clients a shorter validation path can be either set up by MSF Supply or choosen by clients:

and its correspondent technical flow:

Standard lists and forecasts follow a four steps validation path:

  • No labels